Effect
of novation, rescission and alteration of contract.
If
the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to
rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed. Section
62.
Agreement
of parties
A
contract is concluded when in the mind of each contracting party there is a
consensus ad idem and a modification or revocation of the contract may be made
with a like consensus. Thus where the plaintiff entered into a contract with
the defendants for the supply of liquor at stipulated rates for 7 years, it was
open to the parties to agree to an increase in the agreed rates at any time
during the stipulated period even if the plaintiffs had supplied liquor for
sometime and received payment at the original rates.
Performance
of original agreement between parties is dispensed with only where parties to
contract agree to substitute original contract by a new contract. Where there
is no mutual. agreement among all the parties to substitute a .new contract for
the old contract there cannot be a novation. No legal novation or modification
of an existing contract is created in a case where one party proposes. the
novation but the other party accepts the proposal in a qualified manner.
One
party to .a contract cannot unilaterally alter the terms of the contract', or
cancel it. Where a party to a contract repudiates the contract it is not
effective till it is accepted by the other party and rights under the contract
are not given up. It must however be noted that a party may repudiate a
contract unilaterally where it is an express term of the contract that one of
the parties to it may alter it by itself.
Implied
agreement
An
agreement to alter or rescind a contract may be express or implied. Thus a
balance signed by the defendant which states as payable a rate of interest
different from the Tate usually charged in the previous accounts, amounts to a
new contract which can form the basis of a suit.
What is novation
Section
62 deals with novation of contract Novation takes place when for an existing
contract some new contract is substituted. either between the same parties or
between different parties, the consideration mutually being the discharge of
the old contract. Novation is brought about by introduction of new parties. or
alteration between the same parties by introduction of new terms. It is not
consistent with the original debtor remaining liable in any form on the must be
extinguished and there must be present substitution of another contract for the
original contract.
Novation
would amount to substitution of contract and not a mere variation of its terms.
Before novation could occur it must be shown as a fact that intention of
parties was to substitute a new contract for the original contract. Parties
,must rescind the prior contract altogether in order that there may be a valid
novation; if there is no such intention, there is no substitution and the
original contract is available to the parties.
Novation
by collateral agreement
A
collateral agreement must be, in every sense a complete legal contract .and the
effect must be to vary or add to the terms of the contract.. Such Collateral
agreements are viewed with suspicion and so must be proved strictly. The terms
of the agreement and also the animus contract on the part of all the
parties must be established clearly. No laxity in this respect should be
allowed.
Rescission
of previous contract
A
contract will be said to be rescinded by another between the same parties when
the latter is inconsistent with or renders impossible the performance of the
former. There is an implied rescission of contract when a new and inconsistent
contract is agreed upon regarding the same subject-matter between the same
parties.
Intention
of parties
The
essence of novation lies not in the dissimilarity of the terms between the two contracts
but in the intention of the parties to supersede the old by the new. There is
no novation in absence of intention to rescind, alter or substitute previous
contract.
Novation
of contract can be by contract only
In
order to constitute novation, there must be a new contract and not merely a new
agreement, i.e. there must be a new enforceable agreement.
Arbitration
agreement
Like,
all contracts the arbitration agreement is a contract and unless there is any
specific prohibition in the statute, the contract can be revoked, altered or
varied by the parties to the contract. There is no prohibition in the
Arbitration Act for the substitution of one arbitration agreement by another.
No
novation
When
any of the essential terms, which are preconditions for novation are not
'satisfied, the subsequent contract, claimed to be operating in substitution or
by way of novation of the earlier one would be rendered ineffective. Unless
parties in such a situation .provide to, the, contrary the earlier contract, if
otherwise still effective, would continue to occupy the field.
Unilateral
act of one party
Any
unilateral act of, a party favouring. the other party like unilateral increase
in rent by tenant and its acceptance by the landlord, would not be novation of
original contract within the meaning of S. 62.
Renewal
of bond
Where
the surety for a treasurer was renewed thrice and old bonds were not returned
and the treasurer was found guilty; it was held that the surety is liable on
all bonds. Renewal of bonds was no novation.
Renewal
of pronote
A
pronote renewing a promise to pay the debt due under a former pronote wipes
out the old debt and creates a new liability and the Court need not enquire
into the old transaction unless where the acknowledged, is barred. by time, so
as to exclude the application of section 19, Limitation Act.
Extension
of time
An
agreement to give time for the payment' of money, due under a pronote is
operative. But renewed bill or promissory note for a debt giving time to the
debtor in consideration of increased interest does not operate as novation:
When the. Mortgagor agreed to accept agreed to accept part of the mortgage.
money by a certain period and actually, accepted it after that period there is
no new contract at the time of the ,acceptance of the part payment but there is merely an
acquiescence in the late payment.
Acknowledgement
of debt
Acknowledgement
of an existing debt does not change the nature of the debt or operate to create
a new debt.
Effect
of novation
When
a contract is novated a fresh contract comes into existence, directly, or by
implication, in place of the on tract. A contract would be rescinded by another
contract between same parties where new contract, was inconsistent with, or
rendered impossible the performance of the former contract. Where legal effect
of both contracts, i.e. new and the former one was the same though they
differed in- terms, even then it .would is mere ratification of the former and
both must be construed together.
Novation
of illegal contract
If
unlawfulness or illegality is even indirectly connected with a perfectly
innocent and legal contract, the contract is rendered unlawful or illegal and
the 'Court would refuse to enforce such -a contract. In this respect cases of
contracts whose considerations becomes void have to be distinguished from other
contracts where the consideration is unlawful or illegal. In the former class
of contracts the mere fact that the earlier or the collateral contracts might
be void cannot preclude a plaintiff from maintaining an action on a novated
contract which is perfectly legal. Although a wagering contract cannot be the
basis of a cause of action in a Court of law, if the wagering contract be a
collateral one or if the rights and liabilities of the parties stand altered by
a novation, the contract although, of a wagering nature in its origin can be
enforced in view of the altered rights and liabilities.
Subsequent
contract not enforceable
Where
new contract suffered from legal flaw such as 'want of registration:- stamps,
etc. on account of which the same became. Unenforceable, original contract
would not be extinguished and rights and liabilities of parties would be
determined on that basis. Where new contract was to enforced subject to
permission from authorities concerned. No such permission was accorded by said
authorities. New contract never came into force and there was to novation of
contract.
Novation
by substitution of new party
To
supersede a contract by another contract, all the parties to first contract must
be parties to the second contract: Where the original partnership was bifurcated
into two different organizations. New
arrangement arrived at between .parties under a separate agreement could not be
treated under original partnership, between the parties. Such arrangement
arrived at between parties also included two more persons. 'It was held that
new arrangernent having been arrived at between parties, basis of claim for
dissolution and accounts as averred in Plaint in terms of original partnership
(deed did not exist.
Assignment
of liability
An
assignment of contract to be operating must amount to a novation, requiring the
consent of the other party to the contract. In every case where with the
consent of the creditor another debtor is substituted for the original debtor
there is in effect as assignment of liability. The new debtor would be an
assign of the original debtor so long as the identity of debt is maintained.
Substitution
of new debtor
Where
a new debtor is substituted by a contract for the previous debtor the question
is not only whether the new debtor has consented to assume liability but
whether the creditor has agreed to accept his liability in substitution of the
liability of the original debtor.
Cross
contracts
In
"cross contracts" the second contract does not operate to extinguish
the first contract completely nor is it effective as a novation. The two
contracts are distinct and separate and the intention of the parties only to
pay the differences does not extinguish them.
Agreement
to substitute in future
In
order to operate as a novation under S. 62 the new contract must involve
present super session or extinguisher of the liability arising under the 'old
contract. A mere agreement between the parties to effect such a super session or
extinguisher at a future date cannot constitute 'novation. Thus the mere fact
that a party. had asked for compensation as an alternate relief would not imply
that it no longer insisted upon specific ' performance of the agreement in
question. Extension of time by parties for execution of agreement would not
amount to novation of earlier agreement. Decree for specific performance of
agreement of sale was, thus, valid and objections relating to presence of
alternate relief in prayer clause of plaint and extension of time by the
parties for execution of agreement in question, were of no consequence.
Novation
after breach of contract
Section
62 contemplates that the original contract subsists and that the parties have
agreed to replace it by a new contract. If there is a breach of the original
contract S. 62 does not apply. If after a breach of contract the parties enter
into a new contract to settle the amount of damages suffered in the breach of
old 'contract, the cause of action based on the old contract is wiped out and
the plaintiff can only sue on the later contract.
Effect
of invalid novation
To
effect novation a substituted contract must be capable of enforcement in law.
The giving of a hundi in payment of the price of goods sold operate as a
payment, only if the 'hundi is honored and if the hundi is dishonored as the
right to sue on the original cause of action is revived; but if another hundi
is substituted, it would operate as discharge of the first one only if the new
contract could be legally enforced, failing which the plaintiff can fall back
on the first hundi.
Novation
of oral agreement by written invalid agreement
When
an oral agreement is subsequently embodied in a deed unenforceable due to
improper stamp, the creditor cannot fall back on the oral agreement.
Invalid
negotiable instrument
Where
there is a pre-existing debt or liability and a promissory note or bill of
exchange is passed in respect of it, the plaintiff can fall back on the
original consideration if for any reason the new contract fails. The execution
of a promissory note in satisfaction of a debt does not necessarily mean that
the original debt is extinguished but the note may operate as a substitute for
that debt and the original debt is kept in abeyance pending the discharge or
otherwise of the promissory note. It is however certainly open to the parties
to treat the original debt as discharged and substitute therefore the
obligation under the promissory note.
Alternation
of document
Any
material in an instrument even with the consent of the parties vacates the
original instrument and makes it a new instrument.
0 comments:
Post a Comment