1. INTRODUCTION
It
is a general principle in criminal law that for a person's liability to be
established it must be shown that the defendant possessed the necessary Mens
Rea at the time-the Actus Reus was committed. The Actus Reus is the amounts to
be a crime only when it is accompanied by the appropriate Mens Rea. To cause an
Actus Reus without the requisite Mens Rea is not a crime but may be an innocent
Act.
2.
GENERAL PRINCIPLE
The
general principle in criminal law Actus Reus and Mens Rea is Latin maxim, which
is "Actus Non Facit Reum Nisi Mens
Sit Rea."
It
means that, "Any act does not make a
man guilty unless his mind be also guilty."
This
principle is based on the fact-that alone Actus Reus or Mens Rea cannot create
liability; so there must be coincidence of both at the time of occurrence of
crime.
Example
A since two months is carrying Mens Rea for killing B. One day A was driving
car fast. The car of A hits a person. But A . does not know at that time it was
B because his back was towards A. Here there is Actus Reus but not Mens Rea.
Though A has been carrying Mens Rea for B since two months but when A cal. hits
B i.e. at the time of occurrence there was no Mens Rea but only Actus Reus, so
A will not be liable for murder but will be liable for killing recklessness.
3. ACTUS REUS
The
Actus Reus of an offence includes all elements of crime except the mental element.
It can be an act a circumstance, an omission, a state of affairs or an
occurrence. Actus Reus is a Latin phrase that literally means "the guilty
act". But generally means "the forbidden conduct." It also has a
well known definition "Such results of human conduct as the law seeks to
prevent." e.g. the Actus Reus of murder and manslaughter is unlawful
killing of any person.
4. MEANING OF ACTUS REUS
(i) Literal
Meaning
Actus Reus means "Such result of human conduct as the law
seeks to prevent."
(i) Legal
Meaning
Actus Reus means "An act done in furtherance of intention or
due culpable to prevent"
5. ANATOMY OF ACTUS REUS
(I)
CONDUCT
(i)
Act
The
core element of any Actus Reus is defendant's conduct, such conduct usually
consists of some act or act on the part of D which any necessary consequences /
result in any necessary circumstances.
(a)
It must be Voluntary Act
Muscular
movement of defendant must be willed by his conscious mind. If they are not
willed by the defendant's conscious mind then they would be regarded as
involuntary act, until and unless sit is proved, that the behavior of the
criminal was to inflict harm, it will not constitute liability.
(b) Atitonsatism
A
person is automation when has no control over his muscular movements."
Most
of the cases falling under involuntary act concern automatism. Automatism is
divided into different kinds/types such as:
(i)
Automatism due to insanity
(ii)
Automatism due to other reasons, and
(iii)
Self induced automatism.
The
plea of insanity is avoided by defendants as it usually results in going to a
mental institution at pleasure of authorize.
(ii)
Omission
It
is possible to be criminally liable for a failure to act but it is still for
less common than liability for a positive act. In this situation a person will
be liable where a specific statutory provision imposes a duty to act.
Example:
A willful neglect of child or failing to report a motor accident.
(a)
Specific Statutory Provisions
A
person will be only liable where a specific statutory provision imposes a duty
to act. There are some special, situations where courts deem the defendant to
act in a particular way. An in such occasion defendant's omission may be
punished under a statute that speaks in terms of positive acts.
(b)
Contract
Similarly,
a legal duty may arise out of a contract.
Example
A
life guard is hired by city to guard a beach. Internationally life guard fails
to save the victim from drawing, life guard will probably by criminlally liable
despite the fact that this conduct was an omission rather than an act, his
contract with city council imposed a duty to take action.
c. Relationship
In
close blood relationship, the defendant will be criminally liable for a failure
to act.
d. Where Defendant (D) creates a Dangerous Situation
If
the defendant (D) creates a danger himself then generally he has a duty to save
the life of other person.
Example
D
digs a hole in the road in front of his house with boundary of the house,
acting legally under building permit. If D sees that person A is about to step
in unforeseen hole and he steps in and dies. Then D will be held criminally
liable, because he created the situation.
(iii)
Possession
Law
recognizes various degrees of this Act. Actually possession means physically on
your person. Constructive possession means physically under you control knowing
possession means you know what you are possessing. Unwilling possession is
where something has been planted on your. The only punishable types of
possession are the ones that are conscious and knowable e.g possession of
narcotics.
(II)
CIRCUMSTANCES
Whether
the crime is a result crime or a conduct crime, it would almost certainly
require the presence of some defined surrounding circumstances. These
circumstances may constitute a w "state of affairs" that makes the
act of accused unlawful when we talk about circumstances in relation to Actus
Reus it means only those which are legally relevant i.e. those which are laid
down in the offence's definition. It is clear that no crime can be committed
unless all the elements of Actus Reus are present including any prescribed
circumstances.
(i) Before
Occurrence:
Section 378 of the Pakistan Penal Code,
1860 (PPC 1860):
Theft:
"Whoever, intending to take dishonesty any movable property out of the
possession of any person without that person's consent, moves that property in
order to such taking, is said to commit theft and will be punished for a period
of 3 years. Here the Actus Reus of theft is appropriate property"
belonging to another, which to be deprived dishonestly. The conduct which is
the central feature of the crime is "appropriate property" and an
essential circumstance before the occurrence, which must be present in that the
"property belongs to another".
(ii)
After occurrence
The
circumstances after the occurrence in the above stated illustration is that
nothing needs to result from defendant's act of taking the property and
therefore theft is conduct crime.
(iii)
Consequences/Result
Some
are well known crimes require that defendant causes a particular prohibited
consequences/result. Crimes which do require the production of prescribed
consequences are known "result crimes".. In this consequences/results
are always relevant, as we connect consequences and conduct.
Example:
Section
302 of PPC 1860 if 'A' shoots 'B' and 'B' dies, we can say the
consequences/results is connected with conduct and result crime. While in
conduct crimes once a person does a prohibited act it ends after one commits
it. In this consequences are not always relevant.
6. MENS REA
Although
Mens Rea is generally "thought" as meaning "guilty mind or
criminal intention" and actually it means whatever state of mind
D(defendant) must be proved to have according to the definition of the crime
charged. It is the mental state required for a crime. It is as crucial as that
of Act Reus. It symbolizes the requirement that there be a "culpable state
of mind." But other crimes required merely as "negligence" &
'recklessness' which is not really a state of mind at all.
7. FORMS OF MENS REA
The
Men's Rea may assume one or other of two distinct forms namely.
(i)
Wrongful intention.
(ii)
Culpable negligence.
The
offender may either have done the wrongful action purpose or he may do it
carelessly and in each case the mental attitude of the doer is such as to make
punishment effective.
(I) INTENTION / KNOWLEDGE
Intention
is an essential ingredient on a charge of attempting to commit an offence. it
is the highest point faint for blame worthiness. Knowledge is near to it. It
includes the maximum voluentiariness in it and so it takes to the conclusion of
Act. That is why severe punishments are attached with the crimes does with
intention. This so because accuse is well aware fo his conduct and in many
cases can reasonably foresee its consequences, knowledge determines the
reasonably foresee its consequences, knolwedge dtermines the certainty of
result.
(i) General Intent
A
crime requiring merely "general intent" is a crime for which it must
be shown that defendatn (D) desired to consist the act which served as teh
Actus Reus.
(ii) Specific Intent
Where
a crime requires specific intent means that D in addition to bring about the
Actus Reus must have desired to do somethign further.
(II) RECKLESSNESS
Recklessness
means unjustifiable risk taking i.e actions involved a risk of the prohibited
conduct or consequence / result occurrence and it is unreasonable in the
circumstances to take that risk. It involves a substantial risk, a risk of
which D is consciously aware and he ignores it. The risk must be one which in
all circumstances is unreasonable to take.
(i)
Subjective Recklessness
Key
element in subjective recklessness is that D must know that he is taking a risk
of the forbidden consequence/result occurring. He recognizes that there is a
risk and he is aware of its happing. It means that he foresees the possibility
of its occurring and still he ignores it and takes unjustifiable risk.
(ii)
Objective Recklessness
In
objective recklessness, the defendant is blamed for failing to think and act in
accordance with ordinary standards of conduct laid down by the courts.
(III)
NEGLIGENCE
Negligence
means the failure to take due care which a person in expected to take in the
circumstances of a particular situation. If the defendant was aware if the risk
and decided to take it, he was reckless; if he was unaware of the risk but
ought to have been aware of it, he was negligent. Under the common law, the
reckless man was liable, the negligent was not. There are two types/kinds of
negligence:
(i)
Gross Negligence
If
the defendant falls seriously short of the standard i.e. expected of the
ordinary prudent person, it is Gross Negligence or Extreme Carelessness.
(ii)
Ordinary Negligence
On
the other hand, ordinary negligence is not a serious one and it is Average
Carelessness.
(IV)
STRICT LIABILITY
Strict
liability is the case where no Mens Rea is required. Defendant is held liable
for the criminal offence at the same time when he does that illegal act. These
are not very grave offences and not have a long or grave punishment.
8. COINCIDENCE OF ACTUS REUS AND MENS REA / IMPOSED OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Generally,
in order to impose criminal liability upon a person the following expression
must be proved;
Actus
Reus + Mens Rea = Criminal Liability
It
means that criminal liability can be imposed only when there is coincidence of
Actus Reus and Mens Rea, no liability can be imposed if any of them is not
present at the time of occurrence. They must coincide it the time of
occurrence.
This
principle is based on the following Latin maxim;
Actus
non Tacit reum nisi mens sit rea
It
means that an act does not make a man guilty of a crime unless his mind is also
guilty.
9.
EXCEPTIONS TO GENERAL RULE
Generally
it is true that criminal liability can be imposed only where Actus Reus
coincide the Mens Rea. But in some cases
one can be held liable in the presence of either of the elements.
(i)
Without Actus Reus
In
case of conspiracy against state, there is no Actus Reus but only Mens Rea,
nevertheless the defendant would be held liable for criminal act. There is no
need to prove Actus Reus in this case.
(ii)
Without Mens Rea
In case
of strict liability, where there is not Mens Rea but only Actus Reus
nevertheless criminal liability would be imposed on the defendant. e.g.
violation of traffic rules etc.
10.
CONCLUSION
There
are two basic essentials / elements of crime viz. Actus Reus and Mens Rea. The
prosecution is generally required to prove Actus Reus and Mens Rea and existing
of the two at the same time; when these conditions are fulfilled, only then the
criminal liability can be imposed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment