1. Introduction
Section 378, 379, 383 and 384
explains fully the definitions and punishment of theft and theft the extortion
occupies a middle place between theft and robbery. Both offences are different
from each other.
2. RELEVANT PROVISION
Following are the relevant
provisions of PPC regarding the concerned topic:
Sections 378 and 379 for theft.
Sections 383 and 384 for
Extortion.
3. THEFT IT SEC . 373
Whoever, intending to take
dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without
that person's consent, moves that property in order to such tacking, is said to
commit theft.
I. INGREDIENTS OF THEFT:
In order to constitute theft,
following factors are essential.
(a) Dishonest intention to take
property.
(b) Property must be moveable
(c) That , should be in
possession of other person.
(d) There must be remove or
moving of that property.
(e) Without consent of the owner.
II. PUNISHMENT U/SEC. 379:
Whoever commits theft shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to
three years or with fine or with both.
4. EXTORTION U/SEC. 383:
Whoever intentionally puts any
person in fear of any injury to that person or to any other and thereby
dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any
property or valuable security or anything signed or sealed which may be
converted into a valuable security, commits extortion.
I. INGREDIENTS:
Following are the ingredients of
extortion.
i. Fear of Injury
There must be intentionally
putting a person in fear of injury to himself or another. Injury implies
illegal harm, and it may be of any kind.
Illustration
`A' threatens 'B' that he will
keep 'A's child in wrongful confinement unless ‘A' gives him certain amount of
money. 'A' has committer extortion:
(ii) Dishonest Inducement
The element of dishonesty if the
essence of the offence of extortion. There can be no extortion unless a person
is by threat of injury dishonestly induces to deliver to any person any
property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be
converted into valuable security.
Illustration
`A' by putting 'Z' in fear of
previous hurt, dishonestly induces 'Z' to sign or fix his seal to a blank paper
and deliver it to 'A'. Signs and delivers the paper to 'A'. Here as the paper
so signed may be converted into a valuable security `A' has committed
extortion.
a. Try any Person
It is not necessary that the
threat should be used and the property received by one and the same individual.
A threat may be made by some and the property received by other persons, and
all will be guilty of extortion.
II. PUNISHMENT U/SEC 384
Whoever, commits extortion shall
be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend
to three years or with fine or with both.
5. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEFT AND EXTORTION
I. AS TO CONSENT
a. In extortion, consent is
obtained by putting the person in possession of property in fear of injury to
himself or any other person.
b. In theft, the offender's
intention is to take the property without the owner's consent.
II. ELEMENT OF FORCE
a. There is element of force in
the offence of extortion as the property is obtained by putting a person in
fear of injury to that person or any other.
b. There is no element of force
in theft.
III. SCOPE
a. Extortion is wider in scope as
it covers any kind of property, valuable security or anything that my be
converted into valuable security.
b. Theft covers only the cases of
moveable property.
iv. PROPERTY
a. In extortion, both moveable
and immovable property may be the subject of the offence.
b. In theft it is limited only to
moveable property.
v. EFFECT
a. In extortion, the property is
delivered.
b. In theft, there is dishonest
removal of property.
Vl. TAKING OF PROPERTY
a. In extortion, threat may be by
one person and the property may be received by another person.
b. In theft, property must be
move by a person in order to such taking.
6. ANALYSIS
In last to Conclude I can say
that theft and extortion are two different offences, relating to property. The
main difference between theft and robbery is presence of force in theft by
extortion and element of force is absent in thefts.
0 comments:
Post a Comment