I.
Source
By
the word source is meant the formal origin of a rule which confers legal force
upon that rule. The word source may also be used other senses: thus the historical
sources of a written constitution include both the mediate circumstances in which
it was framed and adopted, and also the long-term factors which influenced its making.
II. Nature
of the Constitution
If the United Kingdom possessed a written constitution, the main rules of constitutional law would be contained within it. Alterations to these rules would be made by the procedure laid down for amendment of the constitution. In all probability, Parliament would be authorized to make detailed provision for such matters as the machinery of elections and the structure of the courts. If a court exercised the function of interpreting and applying the constitution in disputed cases, its decisions would be an authoritative indication of the meaning of the constitution.
If the United Kingdom possessed a written constitution, the main rules of constitutional law would be contained within it. Alterations to these rules would be made by the procedure laid down for amendment of the constitution. In all probability, Parliament would be authorized to make detailed provision for such matters as the machinery of elections and the structure of the courts. If a court exercised the function of interpreting and applying the constitution in disputed cases, its decisions would be an authoritative indication of the meaning of the constitution.
III.
Kind of the rules of the Constitution
The
rules of the British Constitution may be divided as legal rules and non-legal
rules. The detail of the difference may be discussed as under;
1. Sources of legal rules
In
the absence of a written constitution, the main sources of legal rules of the
constitution may be described as under
a.
Legislation
Legislation
acts of Parliament; legislation enacted by ministers and other authorities upon
whom parliament has conferred power to legislate; exceptionally, legislative
instruments issued by the Crown under its prerogative powers; and since 1973,
legislation enacted by organs of the European Communities.
In the
absence of a written constitution, many acts of Parliament have been enacted
which relate to the system of government. There are few topics of
constitutional law which have not been affected by legislation. Those statutes
which deal with matters of constitutional law do not form sections of a
complete constitutional code. Some of the instances of legislation in antiquity
are as under;
i.
Magna Carta
Magna
Carta, first enacted in 1215 and confirmed on numerous occasions thereafter,
was passed by the English Parliament long before the formation of the present
United Kingdom. The importance of Magna Carta lies in the fact that fact that
it contained a statement of grievances, the settlement of which was brought
about by a union against the King of important classes in the community.
ii.
Petition or Right
Another
document enacted by the English Parliament at a later period of constitutional
conflict is the Petition of Right 1628. The Petition of Right contained
protests against taxation without consent of the parliament, and arbitrary
imprisonment etc.
iii.
Bill of Rights and claim of Rights
The ‘Glorious
Revolution’ of 1688 brought about the downfall of James II of England and James
VII of Scotland from his two thrones and the re-establishment of the monarchy
in the two kingdoms on terms laid down by the English and Scottish Parliaments
respectively. These terms were accepted by the incoming joint monarchs, William
and Mary. In England it was the House of Lords and
the remnants of Charles II’s last Parliament who in 1689 approved the Bill of Rights which was later confirmed by the
post-revolution Parliament.
iv.
The Act of Settlement
The
act of settlement 1700, passed by English Parliament, not only provided for the
succession to the throne, but added important provisions complementary the Bill
of Rights, especially. The Bill of Rights and the Act of settlement marked the
victory of parliament over the claim of kings to govern by the prerogative.
v.
Other statutes of constitutional importance
It
is not intended to cataloger other principle statutes that form part of
constitutional law. To illustrate that statute law is a vital source of
constitutional law it is sufficient to mention the Act of Union with Scotland
1707, the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, the Grown Proceedings Act 1947, the
European Communities Act 1972, the Race Relations Act 1976, the representation
of the People Act 1983, and the public order act 1986, all of which will be
discussed in the book.
b.
The common law proper
This
consists of the laws and customs of the realm which have from early times been
declared to be law by the judges in their decisions in particular cases coming
before them. In the reports of these cases are to be found authoritative
expositions of the law relating to the prerogatives of the Crown, the ordinary remedies
of the subject against illegal acts by public authorities and officials and the
writ of the habeas corpus, which in English law
protects against unlawful invasion of personal liberty.
c.
Interpretation of statute law
The
courts have no authority to rule on the validity of an act of Parliament
(although they have such authority in the case of subordinate legislation) but
they have the task of interpreting enacted law in cases where the correct
meaning of an Act is disputed. Important issues of public law may arise out of
the interpretation of statutes.
d.
Judicial precedent
Judicial
precedent is the decision of the courts expounding the common law or
interpreting legislation. Since 1973, this includes decisions of the European
Court of Justice in relation to community law.
e.
Custom
Another
source of legal rules is custom, i.e rules of conduct based upon social or
commercial custom which are recognized by judicial decision as having binding
force. Custom of this kind is not today an important source of constitutional
law. But many rules of the constitution which do not have the force of law are
based on the customary usages of various organs of government.
d.
Secondary sources
Another
source of legal rules is custom, i.e. rules of conduct based upon social or
commercial custom which are recognized by judicial decision as having binding
force. Custom of this kind is not today an important source of constitutional
law. But many rules of the constitution which do not have the force of law are
based on the customary usages of various organs of government.
f.
Secondary Sources
Secondary
source of constitutional law is to be found in the opinions and conclusions of
writers of books of authority.
2. Non-legal rules of constitution
Many
important rules of constitutional behavior, which are observed by the Sovereign,
the Prime Minister and other ministers, members of Parliament, judges and civil
servants, are contained neither in act nor in judicial decisions. Disputes
which arise out of these rules rarely lead to action in the courts and that
judicial sanctions are not applicable if the rules are broken. Constitutional
writers have applied a wide variety of names to these rules; the positive
morality of the Constitution, the unwritten maxims of the constitution, and a
whole system of political morality, a whole code of precepts for the guidance
of public men.
a.
Constitutional Conventions
The
word “conventions”, refers to rules of political practice which regarded as
binding by those whom they concern, especially the sovereign and statement, but
which would not be enforced by the courts if the matter came before.
Conventions
are found to a greater or less extent in most countries that have written
constitutions. This is so not only in the common wealth countries but also, for
example, in the United States. There the method of electing the President and
the manner of choosing the President’s cabinet which are governed largely by
convention.
b.
Important Conventions
Some
of the important conventions are;
v The ruler does not veto the bills passed by the Parliament. Moreover,
he can nominate new peers in order to counteract the opposition from the House
of Lords.
v The King,/Queen does not preside over the meetings of the cabinet;
this function is performed by the Prime Minister, hence it is possible to
concentrate governmental responsibility in the cabinet.
v Prime minister and Finance minister, both are taken from the House of Commons.
v The sovereign invites the leader of the majority party of the House
of Commons, to form the cabinet.
v The ruler does not normally turn down the advice of the Prime
Minister regarding the dissolution of the Parliament and holding of fresh
elections. It is to be noted, that the Prime minister normally tenders such
advice after no-confidence motion has been passed against the cabinet in the
House of Common.
v Cabinet remains in power so long as it commands the confidence of
the majority party within the House otherwise it has to resign.
v All the ministers are collectively accountable to the House of Commons.
The whole cabinet has to resign in case of vote of no-confidence has been
passed against any of the cabinet-rank minster.
v Parliament meets at least once a year. Moreover, every bill is
given three readings within the Parliament before being translated into law.
v The speaker observes complete neutrality while presiding over
the sessions of the House of Commons. He does not take part in the deliberations
nor casts his vote except to break tie when the votes are equally divided.
v The Law-Lords participate in the meetings of the House of Lords
when it holds it s session as a court of appeal, while other members remain
absent.
v All money bills originate in the House of Common.
v All civil servants of the Queen are tried in the same courts as
ordinary citizens
v Prime Minster always keeps the Queen informed about all
important decisions of the Cabinet. In addition, he acts and a link between the
cabinet and the Monarch.
v The Prime minister prepares the agenda of the House of Commons
in close collaboration with the leader of the opposition. Supremacy of the political
sovereign, in fact, is based on conventions as the courts do not give this body
legal recognition.
v Supremacy of the political sovereign, in fact, is based on
conventions as the courts do not given this body legal recognition.
c.
Some examples of Non-legal rules of the constitution
v It is rule of common law that the royal assent must be given
before a Bill which has been approved by both Houses of Parliament can become
an Act of Parliament.
v At common law the Sovereign has unlimited power to appoint whom
she pleases to be her ministers. Statutes provide for the payment of salaries
to ministers, and limit the number of appointments which may be made from the
House of common.
v Although the conduct of a general election is governed by
detailed statutory rules, there is no legal which regulates the conduct of the
Prime Minister. When the result of the election is known.
v Superior judges in England and Wales hold their offices by
statute during good behavior, subject to a power of removal by the Sovereign on
an address presented to her by both Houses; by statute they are disqualified
from membership of the commons.
v The office of Speaker of the House of Commons has been recognized
by statute. His election is the first business of a newly elected House.
0 comments:
Post a Comment